Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

D+D News

Main News Page


More Fire Danger Seen with New Homes

Monday, March 2, 2015

More items for Color + Design

Comment | More

Modern building materials, designs and furnishings have their advantages, but they also stoke a faster, deadlier house fire than their older counterparts, new research finds.

The dangerous downside to these modern advances was reported by UL (formerly Underwriters Laboratories), the century-old global safety consulting and certification company that tests and validates a wide variety of products and materials.

Faster Fires, Faster Collapses

"UL determined that fires today are more dangerous and pose more risks than in the past," the company reports in the latest issue of its New Science Journal, which focuses on fire safety.

UL_FireSafety
Images unless noted: UL

Mid-20th-century homes were far slower to burn and collapse than new homes, UL found.

"Fire propagation is faster, and time to flashover, escape times and collapse times are all shorter."

UL called the modern home fire a "perfect storm" of conditions and outcomes.

The combination of today's larger homes, open floor plans, increased fuel loads and new construction materials creates "faster fire propagation, shorter time to flashover, rapid changes in fire dynamics, shorter escape times and shorter structural collapse times," the company said.

Studies and Testing

The new research follows hundreds of analytical studies of home fires that UL has conducted over the years.

In 2012, the company's scientists designed a series of experiments that focused on the size and geometry of modern homes as well as modern furnishings and building materials.

The ensuing experiements, which UL called the first of their kind, tested three modern home configurations against three so-called "legacy" configurations.

UL_FireSafety

"UL determined that fires today are more dangerous and pose more risks than in the past," the company reports in the latest issue of its New Science Journal, which focuses on fire safety.

The legacy homes had furnishings from the mid-20th century and building materials from between 1950 and 1970, UL said.

Modern v. Legacy

The tests consistently showed that the modern homes had faster-spreading fires that left shorter escape times, UL reported.

All of the modern rooms transitioned to "flashover"— the point at which a surface reaches its autoignition temperature and emits flammable gases—in less than five minutes, UL found.
 
By contrast, the fastest legacy room took just over 29 minutes to reach flashover, and the legacy-furnished rooms took eight times longer on average to reach flashover.
 
"The experiments revealed that the natural materials in the legacy rooms released energy more slowly than did the fast-burning, synthetic-furnished modern rooms, which leaves significantly less time for occupants to escape the fire," UL found.
 
NISTBurningChair
NIST

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an arm of the U.S. Commerce Department, is among many organizations researching burning behaviors of upholstered furniture.

Most of the modern fires reached flashover or became ventilation-limited before firefighters could have arrived at the scene, the experiments showed.
 
The faster fire spread "has a substantial impact on occupant and firefighter safety," UL concluded.

Walls, Windows and Doors
 
The company also tested four types of new construction materials: wall linings, structural components, windows and interior doors.
 
Today's wall linings are thinner and more easily penetrated by fire than older walls, and today's structural components are lighter and faster to collapse than their 50-year-old counterparts, the report found.
 
For example, UL said, "an engineered I-joist floor system collapsed in less than one-third the time than did the dimensional-lumber floor system."
UL_Firefighter

The "modern fire environment" may lead to a structural collapse within 90 seconds of firefighters' arrival.

Modern windows failed in half the time of older windows, and interior doors failed in about five minutes, UL said.

Collapse, Firefighting Implications

The experiments hold profound implications for structural collapse and firefighter and occupant safety, UL said.

In the "modern fire environment," firefighters who arrive at eight minutes may see the structure collapse within just 90 seconds.

By contrast, legacy fire collapses begin 40 minutes after firefighters arrive, allowing considerably more time for fighting the fire and searching for occupants.

UL says its research will inform the development of new firefighting methods and practices, as well as the future development of building materials and furnishings.

The company is working closely with manufacturers and the firefighting community on the implications of its findings.

New Science Journal's Fire Safety issue may be downloaded free here.

 

   

Tagged categories: Building design; Building materials; Doors; Fire; Health and safety; NIST; Research; Residential Construction; UL; Windows

Comment from M. Halliwell, (3/2/2015, 11:25 AM)

Wow! I think most of us know that some synthetics are far more flammable than their natural counterparts...and we've seen the impacts in residential fires as the siding on nearby homes has melted...but it is surprising to see just how much of an overall impact it is having in a fire scenario. Maybe we should be looking at concrete dome homes some more ;)


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (3/3/2015, 8:54 AM)

Concrete homes would be great - apparently only if we furnished them with natural materials. :D


Comment from M. Halliwell, (3/4/2015, 11:55 AM)

Works for me, Tom....dome home with Amish made, real wood furnishings. Actually, that could be quite a home :)


Comment from Paul Braun, (3/5/2015, 8:07 AM)

I agree. wollen rugs and horsehair-padded chairs. When was the last time you saw a horse on fire?


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (3/5/2015, 11:52 AM)

Paul: http://wallpaperswide.com/download/horse_fire-wallpaper-1600x1200.jpg On a more serious note - most of my furniture is wood (bookcases, tables, chairs) the sofa is covered in cotton, the armchair is covered in linen (I don't know the stuffing, but surface material should be the most important part) The bed would be the big synthetic item - but the sheets/covers are all cotton. Hm. Computer desks are metal frame with melamine-covered particleboard.


Comment from M. Halliwell, (3/6/2015, 10:44 AM)

You could go for the ultramodern / industrial / marine look and do everything in concrete, stainless and porcelain and really minimize the fire load ;)


Comment from Tom Schwerdt, (3/9/2015, 8:47 AM)

I like a firm mattress, but concrete is taking it a bit far.... ;)


Comment from M. Halliwell, (3/10/2015, 11:04 AM)

Well make an exception for you Tom...you can have a regular mattress, but you need a fire blanket ;)


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved