Durability + Design
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on LinkedIn Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram Visit the TPC Store
Search the site

 

D+D News

Main News Page


University to Collect $6.9M Over Floor Slabs

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

More items for Good Technical Practice

Comment | More

The University of Oregon will receive $6.9 million in a settlement with the architect, engineer and contractor of a residence hall with cracking concrete floor slabs.

The university filed suit in March 2015, blaming Hoffman Construction of Portland, Catena Consulting Engineers, and Zimmer Gunsul Frasca Architects LLP over the concrete slabs in the Global Scholars Hall dormitory. The building, finished in 2012, has experienced excessive deflection, the school argued, leading the building to shift and twist. The concrete slabs, according to the suit, are to blame.

Global Scholars Hall
Visitor7, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The University of Oregon will recieve $6.9 million from three firms in a settlement over cracking concrete slabs in the Global Scholars Hall dormitory.

The settlement, which accounts for $5.5 million to be used to fix the defective slabs and $1.4 million to cover legal and engineering costs already incurred, was first reported earlier this month by the Eugene, OR, Register-Guard.

'Substantial Cracking'

The 185,000 square-foot building consists of three towers, and houses 450 students in addition to hosting facilities including a dining hall, library and performance space. It cost $55 million to build.

According to the Register-Guard, the university, in its suit, said that the building has remained safe and habitable, but has required repairs to address the cracking of floors and walls, and their effect on fixtures.

Global Scholars Hall
Ckere, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

University general counsel said the warping in the towers is "like looking in a fun-house mirror." (Central and South Towers pictured, circa 2012.)

“The deflection and cracking of the floor slabs are substantial and have led to defects in the walls and ceilings and uneven floor surfaces in the building,” the suit read. “The deflection also has impacted the performance and functionality of the doors, windows, furniture and built-ins of the building. It also is expected to impact the plumbing, electrical, and other building systems.”

"Based on numerous investigations," it went on, "the excessive floor deflection was caused by Hoffman's improper constructed means and methods used to prepare, construct and pour the concrete floor slabs and/or a deficient design and faulty plans, specifications and details for the concrete floor slabs."

The suit specifically alleged that ZGF designed the slabs with "improper thickness and/or strength," and improperly calculated the deflection that would occur.

'Fun-House Mirror'

University general counsel Kevin Reed told the Register-Guard that warping in the building is noticeable. “It’s like looking in a fun-house mirror,” he said.

The firms named in the settlement did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday (Dec. 19).

Suit Sought More

The school originally sought $8.5 million in the suit. According to the Daily Emerald, Oregon’s student publication, Catena Consulting disputed its inclusion in the suit early on, arguing it hadn’t been responsible for the building design or construction.

Contractor Hoffman argued in 2015 that the university had signed off on the building design, and therefore was responsible for the issues that had come up. The construction firm filed a motion to have its part of the suit dismissed, but earlier this year a judge denied the motion.

The suit was set to go to trial in January 2017 before the settlement was reached.

According to reports, the three firms have not yet determined the amount each will contribute to the final sum. Payment to the university is expected in April 2017.

   

Tagged categories: Architects; Colleges and Universities; concrete; Condominiums/High-Rise Residential; Contractors; Engineers; Lawsuits

Comment from Dick Piper, (12/20/2016, 8:54 AM)

Articles like this should have give more technical information. What has caused the warping and cracking?


Comment from John Dziurman AIA, NCARB, (12/20/2016, 12:11 PM)

I agree with Dick Piper that more technical information should be included.


Comment from Andy Mulkerin, (12/20/2016, 2:47 PM)

Hello Dick and John,

We've included some additional information from the suit. The original suit can be viewed in its entirety here: https://issuu.com/gordonfriedman/docs/global_scholars_complaint. More technical information is not available at this time. The three defendants who settled with the university haven't replied to our requests for comment, and the university hasn't released further details to date, but if that changes, we'll let you know.

Thank you for reading!


Comment Join the Conversation:

Sign in to our community to add your comments.

 
 
 

Technology Publishing Co., 1501 Reedsdale Street, Suite 2008, Pittsburgh, PA 15233

TEL 1-412-431-8300  • FAX  1-412-431-5428  •  EMAIL webmaster@durabilityanddesign.com


The Technology Publishing Network

Durability + Design PaintSquare the Journal of Protective Coatings & Linings Paint BidTracker

 

© Copyright 2012-2018, Technology Publishing Co., All rights reserved